Considerations for CPT decision making for entering crisis situations

1. Is the proposed action one our constituency can support? Is there a critical mass of supporters?
2. Is there a trusted welcoming body in the crisis setting with whom we connect? Is the area one in which CPT or its supporting denominations have experience and relationships of trust established?
3. Is the action explainable as Christian witness?
4. Can we talk freely and with integrity in our constituency about what we do?
5. Is there enough stability in the area that sending people is not negligent? Is it a situation in which there is time for love and nonviolent engagement to work?
6. Are our governments part of the problem?
7. What role are we expected to play? Do we have people suited to this role?
8. Is it a situation for which we have people available who can imagine new ways of living nonviolently? Do we have people who can think fresh thoughts, develop ideas for actions that move things along in a stuck situation and leave a residue of hope?
9. Can provision be made for coping with language barriers?
10. In the context of these considerations does a process of prayer, Bible reading and discernment give a sense of leading to enter a situation?
11. Decisions to enter coalitions should be made by staff subject to the approval of the Crisis Committee, and compatibility with CPT objectives and resources.
12. Time frames should initially be spelled out for the benefit of CPT volunteers and CPT ability to sustain commitment. Extensions can be made upon evaluation of the program effectiveness, and CPT sustainability. When advisable, new personnel should be used for extensions and overlap provided. Attention must be given to the danger of burnout of CPT personnel.